Scientists discovered why people are so drawn to antiheroes, overshadowing both heroes and villains.

A recent study by researchers has shed light on why some individuals are captivated by morally ambiguous fictional characters, such as antiheroes and villains. The study revealed a connection between admiration for these characters and personality traits associated with the Dark Tetrad — Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy, and everyday sadism. These traits appear to influence how people relate to the values, motives, and complexities portrayed by such characters, reports PsyPost.

Fictional characters, including heroes, antiheroes, and villains, dominate narratives in popular media, attracting audiences with their unique moralities. According to lead researcher Elliott K. Doyle, a PhD candidate from the University of Oregon, the allure of these characters may stem from a deeper psychological connection. Doyle noted the variability of preferences based on individual perspectives and the nuances of moral norms across different cultures.

Previous studies have focused more narrowly on character types, often excluding traits such as everyday sadism, which are considered in this research. The study analyzed data from 473 students, predominantly women, with an average age of 19.78 years. Participants rated their admiration for and perceived similarity to 25 well-known fictional characters, ranging from Disney's Mulan to Harley Quinn from DC Comics.

The researchers also presented archetypal descriptions of heroes, antiheroes, and villains devoid of specific narrative context. This dual approach allowed for an examination of how personality traits align with character archetypes, regardless of familiarity with them. Key findings from the study, published in the journal Psychology of Popular Media, indicated that psychopathy and everyday sadism correlate most strongly with admiration for antiheroes — characters that blur the lines between virtue and vice. Villains, while attracting individuals with high scores in these traits, showed weaker associations, particularly with Machiavellianism, likely due to their overt malevolence and fewer redeeming qualities.

In contrast, heroes elicited widespread admiration but were less related to individuals with antagonistic traits. An exception was narcissism, which had a weak correlation with feelings of similarity to heroic figures, possibly reflecting admiration for leadership and recognition. While the study highlights psychological factors influencing character admiration, Doyle cautions against overinterpreting its results. A preference for villains does not equate to possessing antagonistic traits, and such traits do not predict villainous behavior in real life, she notes.

Future research may explore other factors, such as shared experiences of marginalization, that might resonate with audiences and enhance their affinity for morally complex characters. Broader trends illustrate how character archetypes influence audience engagement. For instance, villains are often crafted to provoke self-reflection regarding societal norms, while antiheroes challenge traditional moral codes. This dynamic makes them pivotal in narratives, fostering a nuanced perception of the gray areas in human behavior.

This material is for informational purposes only and does not provide advice that may affect your health. If you are experiencing issues, please consult a professional.